Evidence mapPaperPMID 33868417Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2021

Nurse-managed education: the effectiveness of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes and the prevalence and predictors of dropout from a cardiac rehabilitation programme.

Agnieszka Sławska, Zbigniew Siudak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sources of patients' knowledge about cardiovascular disease prevention in Poland - a pilot study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka SławskaDepartment of Invasive Cardiology, Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Poland.
Zbigniew SiudakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Celsa (Poland) · PLJan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEducation programmes are now very often used to limit the consequences associated with a steady increase in the incidence of cardiovascular disease. It is important to assess the effectiveness of these programmes and the reasons why people drop out.

aimTo evaluate the effects of intensive education of patients undergoing acute invasive cardiology procedures compared to the control group (patients educated in a classical way). MATERIAL AND

methodsRandomized trial. Measurements of body weight and body composition: during hospital stay, at 45 and 180 days after acute coronary syndrome. We used a self-prepared questionnaire, LOR-T and a TANITA BC1000 body composition analyser.

resultsThe sample consisted of 73 patients aged 48 to 89 years. Men constituted 58.9% of the participants. 43.8% of the respondents appeared for a follow-up visit after 45 days, and after 180 days 32.8% came. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), and health condition of the patients did not change significantly during the study. 67.1% of respondents dropped out from the nurse-managed cardiac education programme. People who were in better health, smoking, without comorbidities, having a heart attack, living far from the place of education more often dropped out from follow-up visits.

conclusionsPatient education proved ineffective. Body weight, BMI, and health condition of the subjects, both at the time of inclusion and during the long-term evaluation, were very unfavourable.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeeducationmyocardial infarctionnurseprevention

Identifiers

PMID33868417
PMCPMC8039924
OpenAlexW3154211416

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.