Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33870797›Full record

SynthesisMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022

Current status of neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

Jessica R Allanach, John W Farrell, Miceline Mésidor, Soheila Karimi-Abdolrezaee

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of Medicinal Plants in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Impact of calcitriol and PGDDrug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica R AllanachDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John W FarrellDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Miceline MésidorCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada/Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Soheila Karimi-AbdolrezaeeDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Regenerative Medicine Program, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada/Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CATexas State University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR 156218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune-mediated demyelination and consequent degeneration of oligodendrocytes and axons are hallmark features of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remyelination declines in progressive MS, causing permanent axonal loss and irreversible disabilities. Strategies aimed at enhancing remyelination are critical to attenuate disease progression.

objectiveWe systematically reviewed recent advances in neuroprotective and regenerative therapies for MS, covering preclinical and clinical studies.

methodsWe searched three biomedical databases using defined keywords. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion based on pre-specified criteria. The data were extracted from each study and assessed for risk of bias.

resultsOur search identified 7351 studies from 2014 to 2020, of which 221 met the defined criteria. These studies reported 262 interventions, wherein 92% were evaluated in animal models. These interventions comprised protein, RNA, lipid and cellular biologics, small molecules, inorganic compounds, and dietary and physiological interventions. Small molecules were the most highly represented strategy, followed by antibody therapies and stem cell transplantation.

conclusionWhile significant strides have been made to develop regenerative treatments for MS, the current evidence illustrates a skewed representation of the types of strategies that advance to clinical trials. Further examination is thus required to address current barriers to implementing experimental treatments in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisRemyelinationAnimalsAxonsMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationOligodendrogliademyelinationMultiple sclerosisneuroprotectionneuroregenerationoligodendrocytesremyelinationtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33870797
PMCPMC8688986
OpenAlexW3155515376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.