Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33875860›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2021

Novel approaches to target the microenvironment of bone metastasis.

Lorenz C Hofbauer, Aline Bozec, Martina Rauner, Franz Jakob, Sven Perner, Klaus Pantel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-head comparative study of [Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Hierarchical Targeting of TREM2Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenz C HofbauerUniversity Center for Healthy Aging, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. lorenz.hofbauer@ukdd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-8423
Aline BozecDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg and University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Martina RaunerUniversity Center for Healthy Aging, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Franz JakobDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sven PernerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Klaus PantelDepartment of Tumor Biology, Center of Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. pantel@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-2772
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone metastases are a frequent and severe complication of advanced-stage cancers. Breast and prostate cancers, the most common malignancies in women and men, respectively, have a particularly high propensity to metastasize to bone. Conceptually, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in the bloodstream and disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow provide a snapshot of the dissemination and colonization process en route to clinically apparent bone metastases. Many cell types that constitute the bone microenvironment, including osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts, adipocytes, endothelial cells, haematopoietic stem cells and immune cells, engage in a dialogue with tumour cells. Some of these cells modify tumour biology, while others are disrupted and out-competed by tumour cells, thus leading to distinct phases of tumour cell migration, dormancy and latency, and therapy resistance and progression to overt bone metastases. Several current bone-protective therapies act by interrupting these interactions, mainly by targeting tumour cell-osteoclast interactions. In this Review, we describe the functional roles of the bone microenvironment and its components in the initiation and propagation of skeletal metastases, outline the biology and clinical relevance of CTCs and DTCs, and discuss established and future therapeutic approaches that specifically target defined components of the bone microenvironment to prevent or treat skeletal metastases.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBone NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingTherapies, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID33875860
OpenAlexW3153299698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.