Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33879057›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

FINDER: an automated software package to annotate eukaryotic genes from RNA-Seq data and associated protein sequences.

Sagnik Banerjee, Priyanka Bhandary, Margaret Woodhouse, Taner Z Sen, Roger P Wise, Carson M Andorf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficient evidence-based genome annotation with EviAnn.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Classification of Promoter Sequences from Human Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. GINGER: an integrated method for high-accuracy prediction of gene structure in higher eukaryotes at the gene and exon level.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sagnik BanerjeeProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Priyanka BhandaryProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Margaret WoodhouseCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Taner Z SenCrop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, 94710, USA.
Roger P WiseCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Carson M AndorfCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. Carson.Andorf@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-6704
Agricultural Research Service · USIowa State University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1546858USDA-ARS 2030-21000-024-00DUSDA-ARS 3625-21000-067-00DUSDA-ARS 5030-21000-068-00D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene annotation in eukaryotes is a non-trivial task that requires meticulous analysis of accumulated transcript data. Challenges include transcriptionally active regions of the genome that contain overlapping genes, genes that produce numerous transcripts, transposable elements and numerous diverse sequence repeats. Currently available gene annotation software applications depend on pre-constructed full-length gene sequence assemblies which are not guaranteed to be error-free. The origins of these sequences are often uncertain, making it difficult to identify and rectify errors in them. This hinders the creation of an accurate and holistic representation of the transcriptomic landscape across multiple tissue types and experimental conditions. Therefore, to gauge the extent of diversity in gene structures, a comprehensive analysis of genome-wide expression data is imperative.

resultsWe present FINDER, a fully automated computational tool that optimizes the entire process of annotating genes and transcript structures. Unlike current state-of-the-art pipelines, FINDER automates the RNA-Seq pre-processing step by working directly with raw sequence reads and optimizes gene prediction from BRAKER2 by supplementing these reads with associated proteins. The FINDER pipeline (1) reports transcripts and recognizes genes that are expressed under specific conditions, (2) generates all possible alternatively spliced transcripts from expressed RNA-Seq data, (3) analyzes read coverage patterns to modify existing transcript models and create new ones, and (4) scores genes as high- or low-confidence based on the available evidence across multiple datasets. We demonstrate the ability of FINDER to automatically annotate a diverse pool of genomes from eight species.

conclusionsFINDER takes a completely automated approach to annotate genes directly from raw expression data. It is capable of processing eukaryotic genomes of all sizes and requires no manual supervision-ideal for bench researchers with limited experience in handling computational tools.

Indexed as

EukaryotaSoftwareGenomeMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNAChangepoint detectionEukaryotic gene annotationGene predictionGenomicsOptimized RNA-Seq alignmentTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33879057
PMCPMC8056616
OpenAlexW3155231577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.