ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2021
G1-phase progression in pluripotent stem cells.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rewiring Cellular Context as A Central Mechanism Governing Cancer Stem Cell Survival: Insights from ESC Comparisons.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Direct Mapping of CDK2 Substrates in Embryonic Stem Cells Uncovers an AP-Site Repair Mechanism via HMCES Phosphorylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Variant U1 snRNAs contribute to cell cycle and differentiation control of human iPS cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in an adeno-associated virus transfection-based production process limits the production efficiency.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of G1 phase kinetics on the acquisition of stemness in cancer cells: the critical role of cyclin D.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Coupling of stemness maintenance with cell cycle control in stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Current insights into the oncogenic roles of lncRNA LINC00355.Cancer innovation · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
During early embryonic development both the rapid increase in cell number and the expression of genes that control developmental decisions are tightly regulated. Accumulating evidence has indicated that these two seemingly independent processes are mechanistically intertwined. The picture that emerges from studies on the cell cycle of embryonic stem cells is one in which proteins that promote cell cycle progression prevent differentiation and vice versa. Here, we review which transcription factors and signalling pathways play a role in both maintenance of pluripotency as well as cell cycle progression. We will not only describe the mechanism behind their function but also discuss the role of these regulators in different states of mouse pluripotency. Finally, we elaborate on how canonical cell cycle regulators impact on the molecular networks that control the maintenance of pluripotency and lineage specification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.