Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886580›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Cole Etherington, Joseph K Burns, Simon Kitto, Jamie C Brehaut, Meghan Britton, Sukhbir Singh, Sylvain Boet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Noise, Hearing, and Communication in the Operating Room: A Mixed-Methods Study.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cole EtheringtonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph K BurnsClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Simon KittoDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jamie C BrehautClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Meghan BrittonMain Operating Room, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sukhbir SinghDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sylvain BoetDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-818X

Funding

CIHR 384512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective teamwork is critical for safe, high-quality care in the operating room (OR); however, teamwork interventions have not consistently resulted in the expected gains for patient safety or surgical culture. In order to optimize OR teamwork in a targeted and evidence-based manner, it is first necessary to conduct a comprehensive, theory-informed assessment of barriers and enablers from an interprofessional perspective.

methodsThis qualitative study was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Volunteer, purposive and snowball sampling were conducted primarily across four sites in Ontario, Canada and continued until saturation was reached. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. Directed content analysis was conducted in duplicate using the TDF as the initial coding framework. Codes were then refined whereby similar codes were grouped into larger categories of meaning within each TDF domain, resulting in a list of domain-specific barriers and enablers.

resultsA total of 66 OR healthcare professionals participated in the study (19 Registered Nurses, two Registered Practical Nurses, 17 anaesthesiologists, 26 surgeons, two perfusionists). The most frequently identified teamwork enablers included people management, shared definition of teamwork, communication strategies, positive emotions, familiarity with team members, and alignment of teamwork with professional role. The most frequently identified teamwork barriers included others' personalities, gender, hierarchies, resource issues, lack of knowledge of best practices for teamwork, negative emotions, conflicting norms and perceptions across professions, being unfamiliar with team members, and on-call/night shifts.

conclusionsWe identified key factors influencing OR teamwork from an interprofessional perspective using a theoretically informed and systematic approach. Our findings reveal important targets for future interventions and may ultimately increase their effectiveness. Specifically, achieving optimal teamwork in the OR may require a multi-level intervention that addresses individual, team and systems-level factors with particular attention to complex social and professional hierarchies.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsModels, TheoreticalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamPatient SafetyProfessional RoleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID33886580
PMCPMC8061974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.