Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33900648›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2021

Neonatal Osteomacs and Bone Marrow Macrophages Differ in Phenotypic Marker Expression and Function.

Safa F Mohamad, Andrea Gunawan, Rachel Blosser, Paul Childress, Alexandra Aguilar-Perez, Joydeep Ghosh, Jung Min Hong, Jianyun Liu, Deepa Kanagasabapathy, Melissa A Kacena and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Osteoimmunology in bone malignancies: a symphony with evil.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Osteoimmunology of Fracture Healing.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Macrophages and Bone Remodeling.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Safa F MohamadDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrea GunawanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rachel BlosserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Paul ChildressDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Alexandra Aguilar-PerezDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Joydeep GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jung Min HongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jianyun LiuDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Deepa KanagasabapathyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Melissa A KacenaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-0088
Edward F SrourDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Angela BruzzanitiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0389-4604
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI David W Clapp · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Project-005U54DK106846 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Reuben Kapur, Karen Elizabeth Pollok · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
Regulation of Osteoblast Function by Megakaryocytes: Key Signaling ProteinsR01AR060332 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BRUZZANITI, ANGELA, KACENA, MELISSA A · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
A megakaryocyte/PGE2/osteoblast triad in the normal and aged nicheR01AG046246 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KACENA, MELISSA A, PELUS, LOUIS M · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
Osteomacs and megakaryocytes interact to regulate hematopoietic stem cell functionR01DK118782 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KACENA, MELISSA A, SROUR, EDWARD F · 2019 to 2021
$951k
Osteomacs and megakaryocytes interact to regulate hematopoietic stem cell functionR01AG082275 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KACENA, MELISSA A · 2022 to 2023
$634k
BD FACSAria SystemS10OD012270 · OD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SROUR, EDWARD F · 2013 to 2013
$516k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060332NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046246NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082275NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118782NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106846NIH HHS S10 OD012270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteomacs (OM) are specialized bone-resident macrophages that are a component of the hematopoietic niche and support bone formation. Also located in the niche are a second subset of macrophages, namely bone marrow-derived macrophages (BM Mφ). We previously reported that a subpopulation of OM co-express both CD166 and CSF1R, the receptor for macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF), and that OM form more bone-resorbing osteoclasts than BM Mφ. Reported here are single-cell quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), mass cytometry (CyTOF), and marker-specific functional studies that further identify differences between OM and BM Mφ from neonatal C57Bl/6 mice. Although OM express higher levels of CSF1R and MCSF, they do not respond to MCSF-induced proliferation, in contrast to BM Mφ. Moreover, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), without the addition of MCSF, was sufficient to induce osteoclast formation in OM but not BM Mφ cultures. OM express higher levels of CD166 than BM Mφ, and we found that osteoclast formation by CD166

Indexed as

Bone MarrowMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedMacrophagesMiceOsteoclastsPhagocytosisMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorCYTOFMACROPHAGEOSTEOCLASTOSTEOMACPHAGOCYTOSISPROLIFERATIONSINGLE-CELL QRT-PCRTHROMBOPOIETIN

Identifiers

PMID33900648
PMCPMC10229197
OpenAlexW3158530776

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.