Evidence mapPaperPMID 33903115Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Associations between attainment of incentivized primary care indicators and incident lower limb amputation among those with type 2 diabetes: a population-based historical cohort study.

Laura H Gunn, Eszter P Vamos, Azeem Majeed, Pasha Normahani, Usman Jaffer, German Molina, Jonathan Valabhji, Ailsa J McKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Banting memorial lecture 2025: Aligning clinical practice, policy and research.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura H GunnDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA laura.gunn@uncc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-4526
Eszter P VamosDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Pasha NormahaniImperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Usman JafferImperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College London NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
German MolinaDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jonathan ValabhjiDivision of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ailsa J McKayDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEngland has invested considerably in diabetes care through such programs as the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) and National Diabetes Audit (NDA). Associations between program indicators and clinical endpoints, such as amputation, remain unclear. We examined associations between primary care indicators and incident lower limb amputation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis population-based retrospective cohort study, spanning 2010-2017, was comprised of adults in England with type 2 diabetes and no history of lower limb amputation. Exposures at baseline (2010-2011) were attainment of QOF glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure and total cholesterol indicators, and number of NDA processes completed. Propensity score matching was performed and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for disease-related, comorbidity, lifestyle, and sociodemographic factors, were fitted using matched samples for each exposure.

results83 688 individuals from 330 English primary care practices were included. Mean follow-up was 3.9 (SD 2.0) years, and 521 (0.6%) minor or major amputations were observed (1.62 per 1000 person-years). HbA1c and cholesterol indicator attainment were associated with considerably lower risks of minor or major amputation (adjusted HRs; 95% CIs) 0.61 (0.49 to 0.74; p<0.0001) and 0.67 (0.53 to 0.86; p=0.0017), respectively). No evidence of association between blood pressure indicator attainment and amputation was observed (adjusted HR 0.88 (0.73 to 1.06; p=0.1891)). Substantially lower amputation rates were observed among those completing a greater number of NDA care processes (adjusted HRs 0.45 (0.24 to 0.83; p=0.0106), 0.67 (0.47 to 0.97; p=0.0319), and 0.38 (0.20 to 0.70; p=0.0022) for comparisons of 4-6 vs 0-3, 7-9 vs 0-3, and 7-9 vs 4-6 processes, respectively). Results for major-only amputations were similar for HbA1c and blood pressure, though cholesterol indicator attainment was non-significant.

conclusionsComprehensive primary care-based secondary prevention may offer considerable protection against diabetes-related amputation. This has important implications for diabetes management and medical decision-making for patients, as well as type 2 diabetes quality improvement programs.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultAmputation, SurgicalCohort StudiesHumansLower ExtremityPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsdiabetes mellitusdiabetic footprimary healthcaretype 2

Identifiers

PMID33903115
PMCPMC8076942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.