Evidence mapPaperPMID 33909666Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Changing parental feeding practices through web-based interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ana Isabel Gomes, Ana Isabel Pereira, Magda Sofia Roberto, Klara Boraska, Luisa Barros

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. A longitudinal study of perceived stress, tangible social support, and gender on Mexican American parental feeding practices.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ana Isabel GomesFaculty of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-2516
Ana Isabel PereiraFaculty of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-6947
Magda Sofia RobertoFaculty of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Klara BoraskaFaculty of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luisa BarrosFaculty of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological Science (CICPSI), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Web-based parent interventions designed to promote children's healthy eating patterns can enhance parents' engagement and facilitate behavior change. However, it is still unclear how much the existing programs focus on changing parental feeding practices, and if so, which behavioral methodologies are used and how effective these interventions are in changing these parental behaviors. This systematic review and meta-analysis studied randomized controlled trials of web-based interventions targeting parents of 0-12-year-old children, aiming to promote children's healthy diet or prevent nutrition-related problems and reporting parental feeding behaviors as one of the outcomes. We conducted an electronic search in four databases from the earliest publication date until February 2020. Of the 1271 records found, we retained twelve studies about nine programs, comprising 1766 parents that completed the baseline evaluation. We found recent interventions, mainly directed to parents of young children, with small, non-clinical samples, and mostly theory-based. The programs were heterogeneous regarding the type of intervention delivered and its duration. The most assessed parental feeding practices were Restriction, Pressure to eat, and Food availability/accessibility. The behavior change techniques Instruction on how to perform the behavior, Demonstration of the behavior, and Identification of self as role model were frequently used. Meta-analytic results indicated that most programs' effects were small for the evaluated parental practices, except for Food availability/accessibility that benefited the intervention group only when all follow-up measurements were considered. The development of high-quality and controlled trials with larger samples is needed to determine with greater certainty the interventions' impact on parental feeding behaviors. The more frequent inclusion of measures to evaluate parental practices to support children's autonomy and of self-regulatory strategies as intervention components should be considered when designing programs.

Indexed as

DietInternet-Based InterventionChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolFeeding BehaviorHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParenting

Identifiers

PMID33909666
PMCPMC8081248
OpenAlexW3159793910

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.