Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33916593›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Targeting Protein Kinase C in Glioblastoma Treatment.

Noelia Geribaldi-Doldán, Irati Hervás-Corpión, Ricardo Gómez-Oliva, Samuel Domínguez-García, Félix A Ruiz, Irene Iglesias-Lozano, Livia Carrascal, Ricardo Pardillo-Díaz, José L Gil-Salú, Pedro Nunez-Abades and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Glioblastoma Stem Cells-Useful Tools in the Battle against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noelia Geribaldi-DoldánDepartamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humanas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, 11003 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2149-9050
Irati Hervás-CorpiónInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3991-4147
Ricardo Gómez-OlivaInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-2550
Samuel Domínguez-GarcíaInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.
Félix A RuizInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0748-5015
Irene Iglesias-LozanoInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1054-2386
Livia CarrascalInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4222-5550
Ricardo Pardillo-DíazDepartamento de Anatomía y Embriología Humanas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, 11003 Cádiz, Spain.
José L Gil-SalúInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.
Pedro Nunez-AbadesInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-8492
Luis M ValorInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-0565
Carmen CastroInstituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain.
Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz · ESUniversidad de Cádiz · ES

Funding

Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía ITI-0042-2019European Regional Development Fund ITI-0042-2019Integrated Territorial Investment Operational Programe of the European Commission ITI-0042-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive primary brain tumor and is associated with a poor prognosis. Despite the use of combined treatment approaches, recurrence is almost inevitable and survival longer than 14 or 15 months after diagnosis is low. It is therefore necessary to identify new therapeutic targets to fight GBM progression and recurrence. Some publications have pointed out the role of glioma stem cells (GSCs) as the origin of GBM. These cells, with characteristics of neural stem cells (NSC) present in physiological neurogenic niches, have been proposed as being responsible for the high resistance of GBM to current treatments such as temozolomide (TMZ). The protein Kinase C (PKC) family members play an essential role in transducing signals related with cell cycle entrance, differentiation and apoptosis in NSC and participate in distinct signaling cascades that determine NSC and GSC dynamics. Thus, PKC could be a suitable druggable target to treat recurrent GBM. Clinical trials have tested the efficacy of PKCβ inhibitors, and preclinical studies have focused on other PKC isozymes. Here, we discuss the idea that other PKC isozymes may also be involved in GBM progression and that the development of a new generation of effective drugs should consider the balance between the activation of different PKC subtypes.

Indexed as

enzastaurinepidermal growth factor receptorglioblastomaglioma stem cellsneural stem cellsneuregulinneurogenesisprotein kinase Ctemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID33916593
PMCPMC8067000
OpenAlexW3147624535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.