Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917954›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Importance of Tumor Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Resistance to Therapy.

Vincenzo Mattei, Francesca Santilli, Stefano Martellucci, Simona Delle Monache, Jessica Fabrizi, Alessandro Colapietro, Adriano Angelucci, Claudio Festuccia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting BRD4-A Promising Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PBI-05204, a supercritical CONeoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincenzo MatteiBiomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, 02100 Rieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-088X
Francesca SantilliBiomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, 02100 Rieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-2996
Stefano MartellucciBiomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, 02100 Rieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3952-3162
Simona Delle MonacheDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-915X
Jessica FabriziBiomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, 02100 Rieti, Italy.
Alessandro ColapietroDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Adriano AngelucciDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-1889
Claudio FestucciaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-6475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is known to be the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor. Therapies against this neoplasia have a high percentage of failure, associated with the survival of self-renewing glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), which repopulate treated tumors. In addition, despite new radical surgery protocols and the introduction of new anticancer drugs, protocols for treatment, and technical advances in radiotherapy, no significant improvement in the survival rate for GBMs has been realized. Thus, novel antitarget therapies could be used in conjunction with standard radiochemotherapy approaches. Targeted therapy, indeed, may address specific targets that play an essential role in the proliferation, survival, and invasiveness of GBM cells, including numerous molecules involved in signal transduction pathways. Significant cellular heterogeneity and the hierarchy with GSCs showing a therapy-resistant phenotype could explain tumor recurrence and local invasiveness and, therefore, may be a target for new therapies. Therefore, the forced differentiation of GSCs may be a promising new approach in GBM treatment. This article provides an updated review of the current standard and experimental therapies for GBM, as well as an overview of the molecular characteristics of GSCs, the mechanisms that activate resistance to current treatments, and a new antitumor strategy for treating GSCs for use as therapy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersBrain NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Self RenewalDisease SusceptibilityGlioblastomaHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkerscancer stem cellsglioblastomaglioblastoma stem cellsglioblastoma stem cells and therapy resistanceglioblastoma therapy resistancenew drugs in the treatment of glioblastoma stem cells

Identifiers

PMID33917954
PMCPMC8068366

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.