ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Comparative Analysis of Novel Deep Learning and Ensemble Learning Models to Predict the Allergenicity of Food Proteins.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent insights for fish allergens: novel processing techniques and detection technology.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Review
- Multimodal deep learning for allergenic proteins prediction.BMC biology · 2025Article
- AllergyPred: a web server for allergen prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Food Allergenicity Evaluation Methods: Classification, Principle, and Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mining Bovine Milk Proteins for DPP-4 Inhibitory Peptides Using Machine Learning and Virtual Proteolysis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Prospects for developing allergen-depleted food crops.The plant genome · 2023Review
- Sequence-Based Prediction of Plant Allergenic Proteins: Machine Learning Classification Approach.ACS omega · 2023Article
- A deep learning based ensemble approach for protein allergen classification.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- ProAll-D: protein allergen detection using long short term memory - a deep learning approach.ADMET & DMPK · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional food allergen identification mainly relies on in vivo and in vitro experiments, which often needs a long period and high cost. The artificial intelligence (AI)-driven rapid food allergen identification method has solved the above mentioned some drawbacks and is becoming an efficient auxiliary tool. Aiming to overcome the limitations of lower accuracy of traditional machine learning models in predicting the allergenicity of food proteins, this work proposed to introduce deep learning model-transformer with self-attention mechanism, ensemble learning models (representative as Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) to solve the problem. In order to highlight the superiority of the proposed novel method, the study also selected various commonly used machine learning models as the baseline classifiers. The results of 5-fold cross-validation showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the deep model was the highest (0.9578), which was better than the ensemble learning and baseline algorithms. But the deep model need to be pre-trained, and the training time is the longest. By comparing the characteristics of the transformer model and boosting models, it can be analyzed that, each model has its own advantage, which provides novel clues and inspiration for the rapid prediction of food allergens in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.