Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918556›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Comparative Analysis of Novel Deep Learning and Ensemble Learning Models to Predict the Allergenicity of Food Proteins.

Liyang Wang, Dantong Niu, Xinjie Zhao, Xiaoya Wang, Mengzhen Hao, Huilian Che

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liyang WangKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, The Ministry of Education, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6175-9219
Dantong NiuCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xinjie ZhaoCollege of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaoya WangKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, The Ministry of Education, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Mengzhen HaoKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, The Ministry of Education, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Huilian CheKey Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, The Ministry of Education, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional food allergen identification mainly relies on in vivo and in vitro experiments, which often needs a long period and high cost. The artificial intelligence (AI)-driven rapid food allergen identification method has solved the above mentioned some drawbacks and is becoming an efficient auxiliary tool. Aiming to overcome the limitations of lower accuracy of traditional machine learning models in predicting the allergenicity of food proteins, this work proposed to introduce deep learning model-transformer with self-attention mechanism, ensemble learning models (representative as Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)) to solve the problem. In order to highlight the superiority of the proposed novel method, the study also selected various commonly used machine learning models as the baseline classifiers. The results of 5-fold cross-validation showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the deep model was the highest (0.9578), which was better than the ensemble learning and baseline algorithms. But the deep model need to be pre-trained, and the training time is the longest. By comparing the characteristics of the transformer model and boosting models, it can be analyzed that, each model has its own advantage, which provides novel clues and inspiration for the rapid prediction of food allergens in the future.

Indexed as

allergenicity predictioncomparative analysisdeep learningensemble learningfood allergens

Identifiers

PMID33918556
PMCPMC8069377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.