Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920114›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Scoping Review on Ageism against Younger Populations.

Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez, Ella Cohn-Schwartz, Senjooti Roy, Liat Ayalon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rethinking advanced motherhood: a new ethical narrative.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vânia de la Fuente-NúñezDemographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department of Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9192-2892
Ella Cohn-SchwartzDepartment of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9623-1820
Senjooti RoyLouis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-4014
Liat AyalonLouis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3339-7879

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic efforts have been carried out to study ageism against older populations. Less is known about ageism against younger populations, including how it is defined, how it manifests, its effects, and how it can be addressed. A scoping review was conducted aimed at identifying available evidence on these topics. A comprehensive search strategy was used across thirteen databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Records were screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction was done by one rater and independently reviewed by a second rater. Of the 9270 records identified, 263 were eligible for inclusion. Most of the evidence focused on the manifestation of ageism (86%), followed by a focus on the determinants of ageism (17%), available interventions to address ageism (9%), and the effects of ageism (5%). This study points to the inconsistent terminology used to describe ageism against younger populations and the relatively limited theoretical rationale that guides existing studies. It also highlights key research gaps and points to the strengths of existing research.

Indexed as

AgeismDelivery of Health Careageismdiscriminationprejudicescoping reviewstereotypeyouthism

Identifiers

PMID33920114
PMCPMC8069403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.