Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33922147›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

The Quandary of DNA-Based Treatment Assessment in De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Sigve Nakken, Wolfgang Lilleby, Marta D Switlyk, Karen E Knudsen, Oscar Lilleby, Sen Zhao, Fatemeh Kaveh, Per O Ekstrøm, Alfonso Urbanucci, Eivind Hovig

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sigve NakkenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Wolfgang LillebyDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Marta D SwitlykDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Karen E KnudsenDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Oscar LillebyFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Sen ZhaoDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Fatemeh KavehDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Per O EkstrømDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0299-8295
Alfonso UrbanucciDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2931-3652
Eivind HovigDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-1077
Oslo University Hospital · NOThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Kreftforeningen 198016-2018Norges Forskningsråd 262652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for genetic testing have been established for multiple tumor types, frequently indicating the most confident molecularly targeted treatment options. However, considering the often-complex presentation of individual cancer patients, in addition to the combinatorial complexity and inherent uncertainties of molecular findings, deriving optimal treatment strategies frequently becomes very challenging. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of a 68-year-old male with metastatic prostate cancer, encompassing pathology and MRI findings, transcriptomic results, and key genomics findings from whole-exome sequencing, both somatic aberrations and germline variants. We identify multiple somatic aberrations that are known to be enriched in prostate cancer, including a deletion of PTEN and a fusion transcript involving BRCA2. The gene expression patterns in the tumor biopsy were also strikingly similar to prostate tumor samples from TCGA. Furthermore, we detected multiple lines of evidence for homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), including a dominant contribution by mutational signature SBS3, which is specifically attributed to HRD. On the basis of the genomic and transcriptomic findings, and in light of the clinical case presentation, we discussed the personalized treatment options that exist for this patient and the various challenges that one faces in the process of translating high-throughput sequencing data towards treatment regimens.

Indexed as

disease managementgenomic testingguidelinesprostate cancertreatment biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33922147
PMCPMC8143497
OpenAlexW3153728756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.