Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33928262›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Rheumatology2021

Targeting synovial fibroblast proliferation in rheumatoid arthritis (TRAFIC): an open-label, dose-finding, phase 1b trial.

Arthur G Pratt, Stefan Siebert, Michael Cole, Deborah D Stocken, Christina Yap, Stephen Kelly, Muddassir Shaikh, Amy Cranston, Miranda Morton, Jenn Walker and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting CDKs in the RNAPII transcription cycle.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Emerging Therapeutics in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur G PrattTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stefan SiebertInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Michael ColePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Deborah D StockenLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Christina YapClinical Trial and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Stephen KellyDepartment of Rheumatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Muddassir ShaikhDepartment of Rheumatology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Amy CranstonClinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Miranda MortonClinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jenn WalkerClinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sheelagh FrameCyclacel, Dundee, UK.
Wan-Fai NgTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Christopher D BuckleyNational Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Iain B McInnesInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Andrew FilerNational Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
John D IsaacsTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCyclacel Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L005123/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent rheumatoid arthritis therapies target immune inflammation and are subject to ceiling effects. Seliciclib is an orally available cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that suppresses proliferation of synovial fibroblasts-cells not yet targeted in rheumatoid arthritis. Part 1 of this phase 1b/2a trial aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite ongoing treatment with TNF inhibitors, and to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics.

methodsPhase 1b of the TRAFIC study was a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding trial done in rheumatology departments in five UK National Health Service hospitals. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or the 2010 ACR-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and had moderate to severe disease activity (a Disease Activity Score for 28 joints [DAS28] of ≥3·2) despite stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy for at least 3 months before enrolment. Participants were recruited sequentially to a maximum of seven cohorts of three participants each, designated to receive seliciclib 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, or 1000 mg administered in 200 mg oral capsules. Sequential cohorts received doses determined by a restricted, one-stage Bayesian continual reassessment model, which determined the maximum tolerated dose (the primary outcome) based on a target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 35%. Seliciclib maximum concentration (C

findingsBetween Oct 8, 2015, and Aug 15, 2017, 37 patients were screened and 15 were enrolled to five cohorts and received seliciclib, after which the trial steering committee and the data monitoring committee determined that the maximum tolerated dose could be defined. In addition to a TNF inhibitor, ten (67%) enrolled patients were taking conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. The maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib was 400 mg, with an estimated dose-limiting toxicity probability of 0·35 (90% posterior probability interval 0·18-0·52). Two serious adverse events occurred (one acute kidney injury in a patient receiving the 600 mg dose and one drug-induced liver injury in a patient receiving the 400 mg dose), both considered to be related to seliciclib and consistent with its known safety profile. 65 non-serious adverse events occurred during the trial, 50 of which were considered to be treatment related. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild; 20 of the treatment-related non-serious adverse events contributed to dose-limiting toxicities. There were no deaths. Average C

interpretationThe maximum tolerated dose of seliciclib has been defined for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to TNF blockade. No unexpected safety concerns were identified to preclude ongoing clinical evaluation in a formal efficacy trial.

fundingUK Medical Research Council, Cyclacel, Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre (Versus Arthritis), and the National Institute of Health Research Newcastle and Birmingham Biomedical Research Centres and Clinical Research Facilities.

Identifiers

PMID33928262
PMCPMC8062952
OpenAlexW3134191307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.