Evidence mapPaperPMID 33929327Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Experiences and Factors Affecting Usage of an eHealth Tool for Self-Management Among People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.

Sarah Marklund, Malin Tistad, Sara Lundell, Lina Östrand, Ann Sörlin, Carina Boström, Karin Wadell, Andre Nyberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02696187 (Feasibility and Effects of KOL-webben - an Internet Based Health Promotion Tool Directed Towards People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Staff in the Primary Health Care in Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02696187 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility and Effects of KOL-webben - an Internet Based Health Promotion Tool Directed Towards People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Staff in the Primary Health Care in Sweden

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled83ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsKOLwebben
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MarklundSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-8518
Malin TistadSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0581-2895
Sara LundellSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9688-8101
Lina ÖstrandDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-3867
Ann SörlinSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8257-503X
Carina BoströmDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2506-687X
Karin WadellSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7334-8698
Andre NybergSection of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2782-7959
Umeå University · SEDalarna University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management strategies are regarded as highly prioritized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines. However, individual and structural barriers lead to a staggering amount of people with COPD that are not offered support for such strategies, and new approaches are urgently needed to circumvent these barriers. A promising way of delivering health services such as support for self-management strategies is the use of eHealth tools. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the usage of, and factors affecting the use of, eHealth tools over time in people with COPD.

objectiveThis study aimed, among people with COPD, to explore and describe the experiences of an eHealth tool over time and factors that might affect usage.

methodsThe eHealth tool included information on evidence-based self-management treatment for people with COPD, including texts, pictures, videos as well as interactive components such as a step registration function with automatized feedback. In addition to the latter, automated notifications of new content and pedometers were used as triggers to increase usage. After having access to the tool for 3 months, 16 individuals (12 women) with COPD were individually interviewed. At 12 months' access to the tool, 7 (5 women) of the previous 16 individuals accepted a second individual interview. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. User frequency was considered in the analysis, and participants were divided into users and nonusers/seldom users depending on the number of logins and minutes of usage per month.

resultsThree main categories, namely, ambiguous impact, basic conditions for usage, and approaching capability emerged from the analysis, which, together with their subcategories, reflect the participants' experiences of using the eHealth tool. Nonusers/seldom users (median 1.5 logins and 1.78 minutes spent on the site per month) reported low motivation, a higher need for technical support, a negative view about the disease and self-management, and had problematic health literacy as measured by the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Scale (median [range] 154 [5-2102]). Users (median 10 logins and 43 minutes per month) felt comfortable with information technology (IT) tools, had a positive view on triggers, and had sufficient health literacy (median [range] 5 [5-1400]). Benefits including behavior changes were mainly expressed after 12 months had passed and mainly among users.

conclusionsFindings of this study indicate that the level of motivation, comfortability with IT tools, and the level of health literacy seem to affect usage of an eHealth tool over time. Besides, regarding behavioral changes, gaining benefits from the eHealth tool seems reserved for the users and specifically after 12 months, thus suggesting that eHealth tools can be suitable media for supporting COPD-specific self-management skills, although not for everyone or at all times. These novel findings are of importance when designing new eHealth tools as well as when deciding on whether or not an eHealth tool might be appropriate to use if the goal is to support self-management among people with COPD.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02696187; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02696187. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016851.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf-ManagementTelemedicineFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSelf Carechronic diseaseCOPDeHealthprimary carequalitative content analysisself-management

Identifiers

PMID33929327
PMCPMC8122287
OpenAlexW3138414847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.