ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry
A comprehensive analysis of RAS-effector interactions reveals interaction hotspots and new binding partners.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Revisiting RAS family GTPase signaling: effector selectivity and oncogenic bypass.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- Novel paradigms in KRAS targeting: Unveiling strategies to combat drug resistance.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- B-AP15 inhibited colon cancer cell proliferation by decreasing CDK6, Cyclin A, Cyclin E, c-Myc, and VEGF gene expression.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- KRAS-Driven Tumorigenesis and KRAS-Driven Therapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024Review
- SHANK3 depletion leads to ERK signalling overdose and cell death in KRAS-mutant cancers.Nature communications · 2024Article
- MYC and KRAS cooperation: from historical challenges to therapeutic opportunities in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Functional and structural insights into RAS effector proteins.Molecular cell · 2024Review
- Far-reaching effects of tyrosine64 phosphorylation on Ras revealed with BeFCommunications chemistry · 2024Article
- Analysis of context-specific KRAS-effector (sub)complexes in Caco-2 cells.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Editorial: Identifying the isoform-specific roles of RAS paralogs in health and disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Anticancer drug resistance: An update and perspective.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RAS effectors specifically interact with GTP-bound RAS proteins to link extracellular signals to downstream signaling pathways. These interactions rely on two types of domains, called RAS-binding (RB) and RAS association (RA) domains, which share common structural characteristics. Although the molecular nature of RAS-effector interactions is well-studied for some proteins, most of the RA/RB-domain-containing proteins remain largely uncharacterized. Here, we searched through human proteome databases, extracting 41 RA domains in 39 proteins and 16 RB domains in 14 proteins, each of which can specifically select at least one of the 25 members in the RAS family. We next comprehensively investigated the sequence-structure-function relationship between different representatives of the RAS family, including HRAS, RRAS, RALA, RAP1B, RAP2A, RHEB1, and RIT1, with all members of RA domain family proteins (RASSFs) and the RB-domain-containing CRAF. The binding affinity for RAS-effector interactions, determined using fluorescence polarization, broadly ranged between high (0.3 μM) and very low (500 μM) affinities, raising interesting questions about the consequence of these variable binding affinities in the regulation of signaling events. Sequence and structural alignments pointed to two interaction hotspots in the RA/RB domains, consisting of an average of 19 RAS-binding residues. Moreover, we found novel interactions between RRAS1, RIT1, and RALA and RASSF7, RASSF9, and RASSF1, respectively, which were systematically explored in sequence-structure-property relationship analysis, and validated by mutational analysis. These data provide a set of distinct functional properties and putative biological roles that should now be investigated in the cellular context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.