Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931815›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2022

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: an expert consensus position paper.

Argyrios Ntalianis, Christina Chrysohoou, George Giannakoulas, Grigorios Giamouzis, Apostolos Karavidas, Aikaterini Naka, Constantinos H Papadopoulos, Sotirios Patsilinakos, John Parissis, Dimitrios Tziakas and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. ANMCO POSITION PAPER: Use of sacubitril/valsartan in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Argyrios NtalianisHeart Failure & Cardio-Oncology Unit, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece. arg_nt@yahoo.gr.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-3996
Christina Chrysohoou1st Cardiology Clinic, University of Athens, Hippokratio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
George Giannakoulas1st Cardiology Clinic, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Grigorios GiamouzisUniversity General Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Apostolos KaravidasCardiology Clinic, Gennimatas General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Aikaterini NakaUniversity Cardiology Clinic, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Constantinos H Papadopoulos1st Cardiology Clinic, Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Sotirios PatsilinakosCardiology Clinic, Konstantopoulio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
John ParissisHeart Failure Unit, Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios TziakasUniversity Cardiology Clinic, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupoli, Greece.
John KanakakisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Catheterization Laboratory, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAgia Olga Hospital · GRAlexandra Hospital · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRDemocritus University of Thrace · GRRed Cross Hospital · GRUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short-term mortality and rehospitalization rates after admission for acute heart failure (AHF) remain high, despite the high level of adherence to contemporary practice guidelines. Observational data from non-randomized studies in AHF strongly support the in-hospital administration of oral evidence-based modifying chronic heart failure (HF) medications (i.e., b-blockers, ACE inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) to reduce morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, a well-designed prospective randomized multicenter study (PIONEER-HF) showed an improved clinical outcome and stress/injury biomarker profile after in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) as compared to enalapril, in hemodynamically stable patients with AHF. However, sac/val implementation during hospitalization remains suboptimal due to the lack of an integrated individualized plan or well-defined appropriateness criteria for transition to oral therapies, an absence of specific guidelines regarding dose selection and the up-titration process, and uncertainty regarding patient eligibility.In the present expert consensus position paper, clinical practical recommendations are proposed, together with an action plan algorithm, to encourage and facilitate sac/val administration during hospitalization after an AHF episode with the aim of improving efficiencies of care and resource utilization.

Indexed as

Heart FailureNeprilysinAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensinsBiphenyl CompoundsConsensusHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, AngiotensinStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensinsBiphenyl CompoundsNeprilysinReceptors, AngiotensinsacubitrilAcute heart failureHospitalizationSacubitril/valsartan

Identifiers

PMID33931815
PMCPMC8087533
OpenAlexW3159148088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.