ArticleEndoscopy international open2021
Training methods in optical diagnosis and characterization of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying Research Priorities in Digital Education for Health Care: Umbrella Review and Modified Delphi Method Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence in analysis of endoscopic images to detect residual disease or regrowth in rectal patients with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Structured Integration of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for the Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Predictive Accuracy of Optical Evaluation for High-Risk Serrated Lesions and the Impact of a Brief Educational Intervention.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Assessing realism of artificial intelligence-generated colorectal polyp images: International multicenter blinded reader study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- And Artificial Intelligence Created the Polyps….Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Dysplasia and Malignancy in Colonic Polyps: Preparing for a Resect and Discard Strategy in Canada.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in the management of T1 colorectal cancer: a new tool in the arsenal or is deep learning out of its depth?Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Endoscopists performance in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in artificial intelligence studies.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a narrative review of current data and clinical applications.Singapore medical journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.