ArticleNeuroethics2021
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.
Article in Neuroethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- The foundational role of autonomy for brain-computer interfaces.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Brain-Hype and For-Profit Medical Devices.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Ethical Precision in Nanoscale Brain Interfacing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancing neurotech justice in youth digital mental health: insights from an interdisciplinary and cross-generational workshop.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Review
- Disentangling Superpositions: Interpretable Brain Encoding Model with Sparse Concept Atoms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A study on Chinese college students' acceptance of brain-computer interface technology and its underlying logic-an empirical analysis based on the extended UTAUT model.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- AI product liability under EU and Canadian laws.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Social media addiction and psychological outcomes: the mediating roles of affect, authenticity, and self-image.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Ethical imperatives in the commercialization of brain-computer interfaces.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Ethical Governance Strategies for the Responsible Innovation of Neurotechnologies: A Scoping Review.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Personalized cognitive enhancement for older adults: An aging-friendly closed-loop human-machine interface framework.Ageing research reviews · 2025Review
- Mind captioning: Evolving descriptive text of mental content from human brain activity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Privacy in perspective: research participants' priorities and concerns related to sharing data generated in human neuroscience studies.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Exploring the intersection of brain-computer interfaces and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
- Recent applications of EEG-based brain-computer-interface in the medical field.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Semantic language decoding across participants and stimulus modalities.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- Electroencephalography-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces in Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis (2013-2023).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Neurotechnologies, Ethics, and the Limits of Free Will.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces (BCI) and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators (DBS), will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make recommendations to mitigate negative consequences that could arise from the unregulated development or application of novel neurotechnologies. We explore potential ethical challenges in four key areas: identity and agency, privacy, bias, and enhancement. To address them, we propose (1) democratic and inclusive summits to establish globally-coordinated ethical and societal guidelines for neurotechnology development and application, (2) new measures, including "Neurorights," for data privacy, security, and consent to empower neurotechnology users' control over their data, (3) new methods of identifying and preventing bias, and (4) the adoption of public guidelines for safe and equitable distribution of neurotechnological devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.