Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947148›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2021

Quo Vadis

Liesa Salzer, Michael Witting

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Interactions Between Bacterivorous Nematodes and Bacteria Reduce NAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The metabolic contribution of SKN-1/Nrf2 to the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Application ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Natural Products Drug Discovery: On Silica or In-Silico?Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liesa SalzerResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-0656
Michael WittingResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1462-4426
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 431572533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics and lipidomics recently gained interest in the model organism

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis eleganslipidomicsmass-spectrometrymetabolomicsNMR

Identifiers

PMID33947148
PMCPMC8146106
OpenAlexW3158329689

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.