ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021
Comprehensive analysis of multi-omics data of recurrent gliomas identifies a recurrence-related signature as a novel prognostic marker.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Identification of metabolic reprogramming-related key genes in hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A longer time to relapse is associated with a larger increase in differences between paired primary and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastomas at both the transcriptomic and genomic levels.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Comprehensive analysis of a TNF family based-signature in diffuse gliomas with regard to prognosis and immune significance.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor recurrence is a common clinical dilemma in diffuse gliomas. We aimed to identify a recurrence-related signature to predict the prognosis for glioma patients. In the public Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas dataset, we enrolled multi-omics data including genome, epigenome and transcriptome across primary and recurrent gliomas. We included RNA sequencing data from the batch 1 patients (325 patients) as the training set, while RNA sequencing data from the batch 2 patients (693 patients) were selected as the validation set. The R language was used for subsequent analysis. Compared with primary gliomas, more somatic mutations and copy number alterations were revealed in recurrent gliomas. In recurrent gliomas, we identified 113 genes whose methylation levels were significantly different from those of the primary glioma. Through differential expression analysis between primary and recurrent gliomas, we screened 121 recurrence-related genes. Based on these 121 gene expression profiles, consensus clustering of 325 patients yielded two robust groups with different molecular and prognostic features. We developed a recurrence-related risk signature with the lasso regression algorithm. High-risk group had shorter survival and earlier tumor recurrence than the low-risk group. Compared with traditional indicators, the signature showed better prognostic value. In addition, we constructed a nomogram model to predict glioma survival. Functional characteristics analysis found that the signature was associated with cell division and cell cycle. Immune analysis suggested that immunosuppressive status and macrophages might promote glioma recurrence. We demonstrated a novel 18-gene signature that could effectively predict recurrence and prognosis for glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33948355PMC8085869W3159905081What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.