Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33953352›Full record

ArticleOncogene2021

Application of machine learning to large in vitro databases to identify drug-cancer cell interactions: azithromycin and KLK6 mutation status.

Jeff Sherman, Grant Verstandig, John W Rowe, Yisroel Brumer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Drug Treatment Effect Model Based on MODWT and Hawkes Self-Exciting Point Process.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeff ShermanZephyr AI, Washington, DC, USA. sherman@redcellpartners.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-0357
Grant VerstandigZephyr AI, Washington, DC, USA.
John W RoweColumbia University, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-6612
Yisroel BrumerZephyr AI, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-0198
Zephyr Software (United States) · USColumbia University · USRed Hat (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning promise to yield novel insights by interrogation of large datasets ranging from gene expression and mutation data to CRISPR knockouts and drug screens. We combined existing and new algorithms with available experimental data to identify potentially clinically relevant relationships to provide a proof of principle for the promise of machine learning in oncological drug discovery. Specifically, we screened cell line data from the Cancer Dependency Map for the effects of azithromycin, which has been shown to kill cancer cells in vitro. Our findings demonstrate a strong relationship between Kallikrein Related Peptidase 6 (KLK6) mutation status and the ability of azithromycin to kill cancer cells in vitro. While the application of azithromycin showed no meaningful average effect in KLK6 wild-type cell lines, statistically significant enhancements of cell death are seen in multiple independent KLK6-mutated cancer cell lines. These findings suggest a potentially valuable clinical strategy in patients with KLK6-mutated malignancies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMutationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDatabases, GeneticDatabases, PharmaceuticalDrug DiscoveryHumansKallikreinsNeoplasmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinKallikreinsKLK6 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33953352
OpenAlexW3158628871

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.