Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956207›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Effects of chitosan and platelet-rich plasma on facial nerve regeneration in an animal model.

Muammer Melih Şahin, Melih Cayonu, Secil Kayalı Dinc, Esra Ozkocer, Mert Ilhan, Eray Uzunoğlu, Cigdem Elmas, Metin Yılmaz, Esra Akkol

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muammer Melih ŞahinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. melihsahin@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-2730
Melih CayonuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Secil Kayalı DincDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Esra OzkocerDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mert IlhanDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Eray UzunoğluDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cigdem ElmasDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Metin YılmazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Esra AkkolDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gazi University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is still no widely-accepted local agent proven to be effective in nerve regeneration. We aimed to investigate the effects of chitosan gel and platelet-rich plasma MATERIALS AND

methodsElectrophysiological measurements were performed before and immediately after injury. The injured nerves were covered with spongostan impregnated with the following agents: Group 1 (Control Group): Saline at a dose of 50 µl; Group 2: Chitosan (CHT) at a dose of 50 µl; Group 3: PRP at a dose of 50 ml; and Group 4: a solution of CHT with PRP (1:1). The final measurements were performed after 3 weeks and the injured nerve of each rat was removed.

resultsThere were statistically-significant differences between the groups regarding the measurements of the after-treatment values of stimulus threshold (p < 0.05). The best improvement in electrophysiological measurement and histopathological evaluation was found in Group 4 (CHT-PRP).

conclusionChitosan gel has a positive effect on nerve healing and applying it along with PRP can enhance the effect of chitosan.

Indexed as

ChitosanPlatelet-Rich PlasmaAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFacial NerveNerve RegenerationRatsChitosanChitosanFacial nervePlatelet-rich plasmaRat modelRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID33956207
OpenAlexW3157164061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.