ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
The acoustical and perceptual features of snore-related sounds in patients with obstructive sleep apnea sleeping with the dynamic mandibular advancement system MATRx plus®.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe effect of snoring on the bed partner can be studied through the evaluation of in situ sound records by the bed partner or unspecialized raters as a proxy of real-life snoring perception. The aim was to characterize perceptual snore events through acoustical features in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with an advanced mandibular position.
methodsThirty-minute sound samples of 29 patients with OSA were retrieved from overnight, in-home recordings of a study to validate the MATRx plus® dynamic mandibular advancement system. Three unspecialized raters identified sound events and classified them as noise, snore, or breathing. The raters provided ratings for classification certainty and annoyance. Data were analyzed with respect to respiratory phases, and annoyance.
resultsWhen subdividing perceptual events based on respiratory phase, the logarithm-transformed Mean Power, Spectral Centroid, and Snore Factor differed significantly between event types, although not substantially for the spectral centroid. The variability within event type was high and distributions suggested the presence of subpopulations. The general linear model (GLM) showed a significant patient effect. Inspiration segments occurred in 65% of snore events, expiration segments in 54%. The annoyance correlated with the logarithm of mean power (r = 0.48) and the Snore Factor (0.46).
conclusionPerceptual sound events identified by non-experts contain a non-negligible mixture of expiration and inspiration phases making the characterization through acoustical features complex. The present study reveals that subpopulations may exist, and patient-specific features need to be introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33956293What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.