ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2022
Electronic nursing care plans through the use of NANDA, NOC, and NIC taxonomies in community setting: A descriptive study in northern Italy.
Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The nursing process and total health cost variability: an analysis using machine learning.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Nursing Diagnoses, Planned Outcomes and Associated Interventions with Highly Complex Chronic Patients in Primary Care Settings: An Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Electronic nursing care plans through the use of NANDA, NOC, and NIC taxonomies in community setting: A descriptive study in northern Italy.International journal of nursing knowledge · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo carry on a descriptive analysis of nursing standardized language through the use of a software within outpatient facilities in northern Italy, organized according to the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and called Community Health Centers (CHC).
methodsA descriptive design was adopted for the study. NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC taxonomies have been used to analyze care plans pulled from the software. Both qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed.
findingsThe average of nursing diagnosis correctly identified with respect to the nursing assessment is 83.7% (SD 29.9%). Class 4 diagnoses from Domains 4 have been identified as the most prevalent (22.4%), followed by risk for unstable blood glucose level 00179 (16.4%) and risk for overweight 00234 (13%). The main nursing outcomes were vital signs 0802 (22.5%), blood glucose level 2300 (16%), and weight loss behavior 1627 (11%). The most prevalent nursing interventions are wound care 3660 (27%), medication administration: intramuscular 2313 (19%), and health education 5510 (14%). The analysis shows ability in identifying nursing diagnoses, but a larger variability with outcomes and interventions. The study highlights the nursing role within CHC and identifies the main areas of expertise in chronic disease management: prevention and health education.
conclusionsNurses' role is fundamental for chronic disease management within CHC; NANDA-I taxonomy helps to analyze care plans. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: - A taxonomy such as NANDA-I represents a valid opportunity to make more visible how much nursing skills affect the achievement of a higher level of health in chronic patients. - This study is useful in the further training of outpatient nurses who works in CHC. - The study represents the starting point for future research to deepen the development of a standardized nursing language in outpatient facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.