Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963055›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2021

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Stabilized in the Closed State Induces Potent Neutralizing Responses.

George W Carnell, Katarzyna A Ciazynska, David A Wells, Xiaoli Xiong, Ernest T Aguinam, Stephen H McLaughlin, Donna Mallery, Soraya Ebrahimi, Lourdes Ceron-Gutierrez, Benedikt Asbach and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Stoichiometric insights into SARS-CoV-2 spike-ACE2 binding across variants.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

George W CarnellLaboratory of Viral Zoonotics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Katarzyna A CiazynskaMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David A WellsDIOSynVax, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Xiaoli XiongMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ernest T AguinamLaboratory of Viral Zoonotics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Stephen H McLaughlinMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Donna MalleryMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Soraya EbrahimiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lourdes Ceron-GutierrezDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Benedikt AsbachInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian EinhauserInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ralf WagnerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Leo C JamesMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rainer DoffingerDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan L HeeneyLaboratory of Viral Zoonotics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John A G BriggsMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

EC | H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) ERC-CoG-648432Medical Research Council MC_U105181010Medical Research Council MC_U105184326Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/16UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) 72845UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) COV0170UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_U105181010UKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UP_1201/16Wellcome Trust 200594/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in use or advanced development are based on the viral spike protein (S) as their immunogen. S is present on virions as prefusion trimers in which the receptor binding domain (RBD) is stochastically open or closed. Neutralizing antibodies have been described against both open and closed conformations. The long-term success of vaccination strategies depends upon inducing antibodies that provide long-lasting broad immunity against evolving SARS-CoV-2 strains. Here, we have assessed the results of immunization in a mouse model using an S protein trimer stabilized in the closed state to prevent full exposure of the receptor binding site and therefore interaction with the receptor. We compared this with other modified S protein constructs, including representatives used in current vaccines. We found that all trimeric S proteins induced a T cell response and long-lived, strongly neutralizing antibody responses against 2019 SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern P.1 and B.1.351. Notably, the protein binding properties of sera induced by the closed spike differed from those induced by standard S protein constructs. Closed S proteins induced more potent neutralizing responses than expected based on the degree to which they inhibit interactions between the RBD and ACE2. These observations suggest that closed spikes recruit different, but equally potent, immune responses than open spikes and that this is likely to include neutralizing antibodies against conformational epitopes present in the closed conformation. We suggest that closed spikes, together with their improved stability and storage properties, may be a valuable component of refined, next-generation vaccines.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesHEK293 CellsHumansMiceProtein StabilityACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2glycoproteinsimmunizationneutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33963055
PMCPMC8274612
OpenAlexW3157118466

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.