ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021
Grading nutrition evidence: where to go from here?
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health effects of drinking 100% juice: an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Pooled it
- A narrative review of lifestyle management guidelines for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
- Prioritising viral hepatitis elimination to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma: A public health approach for effective preventive hepatology.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Review
- A methodology for determining dosing recommendations for anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney function.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Mediterranean Dietary Pattern for Healthy and Active Aging: A Narrative Review of an Integrative and Sustainable Approach.Nutrients · 2024Review
- A Primer on Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Diabetes Research.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Nuts and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Review of the Evidence and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Need for a nutrition-specific scientific paradigm for research quality improvement.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2023Review
- Article
- NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Article
- Evidence Use in the Development of the Australian Dietary Guidelines: A Qualitative Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.