ReviewBiophysical journal2021
Imaging developmental cell cycles.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the inference of single-cell phylogenies and population dynamics from CRISPR lineage recordings.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Advances in Cervical Cancer Diagnostics Based on Immunosensors: Innovative Approaches and Tumor Biomarkers.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Decoding cancer dormancy: integrative genomic, phenotypic and live-cell imaging analysis to reveal the hidden cancer cell reservoir.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Article
- Molecular Spies in Action: Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors Light up Cellular Signals.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Two coral fluorescent proteins of distinct colors for sharp visualization of cell-cycle progression.Cell structure and function · 2023Article
- CDK activity sensors: genetically encoded ratiometric biosensors for live analysis of the cell cycle.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Article
- Cell cycle control during early embryogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last decade has seen a major expansion in development of live biosensors, the tools needed to genetically encode them into model organisms, and the microscopic techniques used to visualize them. When combined, these offer us powerful tools with which to make fundamental discoveries about complex biological processes. In this review, we summarize the availability of biosensors to visualize an essential cellular process, the cell cycle, and the techniques for single-cell tracking and quantification of these reporters. We also highlight studies investigating the connection of cellular behavior to the cell cycle, particularly through live imaging, and anticipate exciting discoveries with the combination of these technologies in developmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.