Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967413›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2021

Cell-free DNA in the surveillance of heart transplant rejection.

Dhruva Sharma, Ganapathy Subramaniam, Neha Sharma, Preksha Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhruva SharmaDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, SMS Medical College & Attached Hospitals, J L N Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001 India.
Ganapathy SubramaniamInstitute of Heart and Lung Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support, MGM Healthcare, No. 72, Nelson Manickam Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600029 India.
Neha SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College & Attached Hospitals, J L N Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001 India.
Preksha SharmaDepartment of Anatomy, SMS Medical College & Attached Hospitals, J L N Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302001 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) is promptly materializing as a highly useful tool for the surveillance of solid-organ transplant rejection. Donor-specific fraction (DF) cfDNA is a potential marker of selective donor organ injury. It is emerging as a promising analytical target in the near future. The aim of this systematic review is to throw light on the importance of cfDNA and future perspective in detecting acute rejection in heart transplantation.

methodsAn exhaustive search was carried out for this review article on the basis of literature available including scientific databases of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search engines were systematically explored using the search terms "cell free DNA," "Heart transplant," and "Rejection" from inception until August 2020, and narrative analysis was accomplished. Majority of the studies described endomyocardial biopsy-proven acute rejection as reference standard.

resultsAfter initial screening of 331 articles, 11 studies were included and discussed in detail in the present review article. Majority of the studies showed prospective designs. A firm correlation was noted between acute rejection (identified on endomyocardial biopsy) and cfDNA levels by most of the studies.

conclusionscfDNA is a promising tool to replace repeated biopsies to detect rejection. The development in the area of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction and massive parallel sequencing, along with the overall reduction in cost of sequencing with its automation, has helped establish its role in the transplant population.

Indexed as

Cell-free DNAHeart transplantRejection

Identifiers

PMID33967413
PMCPMC8079572

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.