ReviewHemaSphere2021
Selecting β-thalassemia Patients for Gene Therapy: A Decision-making Algorithm.
Review in HemaSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update of the decision-making algorithm on selecting transfusion-dependent β-thalassemic patients for gene therapy approaches: joint consensus report on behalf of EHA-specialized working group and EBMT hemoglobinopathies working party.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Gene Therapy for β-Haemoglobinopathies: From Molecular Correction to Curative Medicine.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Enhanced induction of fetal hemoglobin by the combination of decitabine with RN-1 in β-thalassemia/HbE erythroid progenitor cells.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Iron toxicity and hematopoietic cell transplantation: do we understand why iron affects transplant outcome?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Article
- First and Second Level Haemoglobinopathies Diagnosis: Best Practices of the Italian Society of Thalassemia and Haemoglobinopathies (SITE).Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Hurdles to the Adoption of Gene Therapy as a Curative Option for Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- Advancing the care of β-thalassaemia patients with novel therapies.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2022Review
- Management of Iron Overload in Beta-Thalassemia Patients: Clinical Practice Update Based on Case Series.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This expert opinion originally developed by a panel of the Italian Society of Thalassemias and Hemoglobinopathies (SITE), reviewed and adopted by the European Hematology Association (EHA) through the EHA Scientific Working Group on Red Cells and Iron, has been developed as priority decision-making algorithm on evidence and consensus with the aim to identify which patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) could benefit from a gene therapy (GT) approach. Even if the wide utilized and high successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation provides the possibility to cure several patients a new scenario has been opened by GT. Therefore, it is important to establish the patients setting for whom it is priority indicated, particularly in the early phase of the diffuse use outside experimental trials conducted in high selected centers. Moreover, actual price, limited availability, and resources disposal constitute a further indication to a rational and progressive approach to this innovative treatment. To elaborate this algorithm, the experience with allogeneic transplantation has been used has a predictive model. In this large worldwide experience, it has been clearly demonstrated that key for the optimal transplant outcome is optimal transfusion and chelation therapy in the years before the procedure and consequently optimal patient's clinical condition. In the document, different clinical scenarios have been considered and analyzed for the possible impact on treatment outcome. According to the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for the GT product, this expert opinion must be considered as a dynamic, updatable, priority-based indications for physicians taking care of TDT patients.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.