Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969622›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2021

Mutated circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy in lung cancer detection and treatment.

Martyna Filipska, Rafael Rosell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07126626 (Multi-center Prospective Validation of the SPOT-MAS Lung Test Using Circulating Tumor DNA for the Detection of Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07126626 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Multi-center Prospective Validation of the SPOT-MAS Lung Test Using Circulating Tumor DNA for the Detection of Lung Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorGene SolutionsRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,184ConditionsLung Diseases, Lung Cancer Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Accurate Early Detection andBiomolecules · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martyna FilipskaGermans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9947-4561
Rafael RosellGermans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0817-3400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, substantial developments have been made in the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments released into the circulation from tumor cells and displaying the genetic alterations of those cells. As such, ctDNA detected in liquid biopsies serves as a powerful tool for cancer patient stratification, therapy guidance, detection of resistance, and relapse monitoring. In this Review, we describe lung cancer diagnosis and monitoring strategies using ctDNA detection technologies and compile recent evidence regarding lung cancer-related mutation detection in liquid biopsy. We focus not only on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations, but also on significant co-mutations that shed more light on novel ctDNA-based liquid biopsy applications. Finally, we discuss future perspectives of early-cancer detection and clonal hematopoiesis filtering strategies, with possible inclusion of microbiome-driven liquid biopsy.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLiquid BiopsyCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLung NeoplasmsMutationPrecision MedicineCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAcancer detectioncfDNActDNAliquid biopsyLUADNSCLCTMB

Identifiers

PMID33969622
PMCPMC8169447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.