ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021
Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH).
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03883568 (A 2-year Multicentre, EU, Exploratory Study Without Therapeutic Benefit in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis to Describe, Validate, and Predict Phenotypes of Knee Osteoarthritis by Use of Clinical, Imaging, and Biochemical), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 2-year Multicentre, EU, Exploratory Study Without Therapeutic Benefit in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis to Describe, Validate, and Predict Phenotypes of Knee Osteoarthritis by Use of Clinical, Imaging, and Biochemical (Bio)Markers.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Citizen science in osteoarthritis research: a scoping review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Developing a congenital hyperinsulinism prioritized research agenda: a patient-driven international collaborative research network.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Article
- Severity and progression of structural hand OA is not associated with progression of structural knee OA: The IMI-APPROACH cohort.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-supported strategy of patient selection for osteoarthritis clinical trials: the IMI-APPROACH study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2023Article
- Predicted and actual 2-year structural and pain progression in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation.BMC rheumatology · 2022Article
- Correction to: Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH).Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
APPROACH is an EU-wide research consortium with the goal to identify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis to enable future differential diagnosis and treatment. During a 2-year clinical study images, biomarkers and clinical data are collected from people living with knee osteoarthritis and data are analyzed to confirm patterns that can indicate such different subgroups. A Patient Council (PC) has been set up at project initiation and consists of five people from Norway, The Netherlands and UK. Initially, this group of individuals had to learn how to effectively work with each other and with the researchers. Today, the PC is a strong team that is fully integrated in the consortium and acknowledged by researchers as an important sounding board. The article describes this journey looking at formal processes of involvement - organizational structure, budget, meetings - and more informal processes such as building relationships and changing researcher perceptions. It describes how the PC helped improve the experience and engagement of study participants by providing input to the clinical protocol and ensuring effective communication (e.g. through direct interactions with participants and newsletters). Furthermore, the PC is helping with dissemination of results and project advocacy, and overall provides the patient perspective to researchers. Additionally, the authors experienced and describe the intangible benefits such as a shift in researcher attitudes and a sense of community and purpose for PC members. Importantly, learnings reported in this article also include the challenges, such as effective integration of the PC with researchers' work in the early phase of the project.
trial registrationUS National Library of Medicine, NCT03883568 , retrospectively registered 21 March 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.