Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975858›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

The Time Varying Networks of the Interoceptive Attention and Rest.

Ana Y Martínez, Athena Demertzi, Clemens C C Bauer, Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca, Sarael Alcauter, Fernando A Barrios

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Y MartínezInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, QRO 76230 México.
Athena DemertziGIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Sart Tilman, Belgium.
Clemens C C BauerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-4438
Zeus Gracia-TabuencaInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, QRO 76230 México.
Sarael AlcauterInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, QRO 76230 México.
Fernando A BarriosInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, QRO 76230 México fbarrios@unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-5699-4222
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXAutonomous University of Queretaro · MXMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused attention to spontaneous sensations is a dynamic process that demands interoceptive abilities. Failure to control it has been linked to neuropsychiatric disorders like illness-anxiety disorder. Regulatory strategies, such as focused attention meditation (FAM), may enhance the ability to control focused attention particularly to body sensations, which can be reflected on functional neuroanatomy. The functional connectivity (FC) related to focused attention has been described, however, the dynamic brain organization associated to this process and the differences to the resting state remains to be studied. To quantify the cerebral dynamic counterpart of focused attention to interoception, we examined fifteen experienced meditators while performing a 20-min attentional task to spontaneous sensations. Subjects underwent three scanning sessions obtaining a resting-state scan before and after the task. Sliding window dynamic FC (DFC) and k-means clustering identified five recurrent FC patterns along the dorsal attention network (DAN), default mode network (DMN), and frontoparietal network (FPN). Subjects remained longer in a low connectivity brain pattern during the resting conditions. By contrast, subjects spent a higher proportion of time in complex patterns during the task than rest. Moreover, a carry-over effect in FC was observed following the interoceptive task performance, suggestive of an active role in the learning process linked to cognitive training. Our results suggest that focused attention to interoceptive processes, demands a dynamic brain organization with specific features that distinguishes it from the resting condition. This approach may provide new insights characterizing the neural basis of the focused attention, an essential component for human adaptability.

Indexed as

InteroceptionMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingHumansNeural PathwaysRestattentionautomatic classificationbrain networkscorrelation matrixinteroceptionk means

Identifiers

PMID33975858
PMCPMC8174797
OpenAlexW3163802479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.