ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021
Improved Selective BIN Agar for a Better Rate of Yersinia pestis Isolation from Primary Clinical Specimens in Suspected Madagascar Plague Cases.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Bivalent mRNA-LNP Vaccine for Highly Effective Protection against Pneumonic Plague.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- 125 years of the plague in Brazil: lessons learnt, historical insights and contemporary challenges.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2025Article
- CYP broth: a tool for Yersinia pestis isolation in ancient culture collections and field samples.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- An Improvement in Diagnostic Blood Culture Conditions Allows for the Rapid Detection and Isolation of the Slow Growing PathogenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Beating the Bio-Terror Threat with Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Tier-1 AgentsFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the WHO, 75% of the world's plague cases are found in Madagascar, with an average of 200 to 700 cases suspected annually (mainly bubonic plague). In 2017, a pneumonic plague epidemic of unusual proportions occurred, which raised several challenges for laboratory confirmation of cases, pointing to the need for the development of Yersinia pestis isolation procedures, especially those that can be performed in remote areas. As the WHO gold standard for plague diagnosis is bacterial culture, we sought to develop a simple method to prepare a highly selective medium, fit for use in remote areas where plague is endemic. The performance of the new medium, named improved BIN, was examined in terms of growth support and selectivity with spiked samples as well in isolating Y. pestis from clinical specimens, and it was compared to the results obtained with commercially available selective media. The preparation of the new medium is less complex and its performance was found to be superior to that of first-generation BIN medium. The growth support of the medium is higher, there is no batch diversity, and it maintains high selectivity properties. In 55 clinical specimens obtained from patients suspected to be infected with Y. pestis, approximately 20% more Y. pestis-positive isolates were identified by the improved BIN medium than were identified by commercially available selective media. The improved BIN medium is notably advantageous for the isolation of Y. pestis from clinical specimens obtained from plague patients, thus offering better surveillance tools and proper promotion of medical treatment to more patients suspected of being infected with Y. pestis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.