Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983115›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

A non-genetic, cell cycle-dependent mechanism of platinum resistance in lung adenocarcinoma.

Alvaro Gonzalez Rajal, Kamila A Marzec, Rachael A McCloy, Max Nobis, Venessa Chin, Jordan F Hastings, Kaitao Lai, Marina Kennerson, William E Hughes, Vijesh Vaghjiani and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A concise guide to fluorescent cell cycle reporters for live-cell imaging.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alvaro Gonzalez RajalANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9230-0339
Kamila A MarzecANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-2205
Rachael A McCloyThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Max NobisSt Vincent's Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-1390
Venessa ChinSt Vincent's Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jordan F HastingsThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2839-4358
Kaitao LaiANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-9352
Marina KennersonANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3332-5074
William E HughesGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Vijesh VaghjianiHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia.
Paul TimpsonSt Vincent's Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jason E CainHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-5894
D Neil WatkinsResearch Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8218-4920
David R Croucher *St Vincent's Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4965-8674
Andrew Burgess *ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Concord, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4536-9226
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUThe University of Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUCancerCare Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously used a pulse-based in vitro assay to unveil targetable signalling pathways associated with innate cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma (Hastings et al., 2020). Here, we advanced this model system and identified a non-genetic mechanism of resistance that drives recovery and regrowth in a subset of cells. Using RNAseq and a suite of biosensors to track single-cell fates both in vitro and in vivo, we identified that early S phase cells have a greater ability to maintain proliferative capacity, which correlated with reduced DNA damage over multiple generations. In contrast, cells in G1, late S or those treated with PARP/RAD51 inhibitors, maintained higher levels of DNA damage and underwent prolonged S/G2 phase arrest and senescence. Combined with our previous work, these data indicate that there is a non-genetic mechanism of resistance in human lung adenocarcinoma that is dependent on the cell cycle stage at the time of cisplatin exposure.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdenocarcinoma of LungAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCell Line, TumorCisplatinDNA DamageHumansLung NeoplasmsMicePoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRad51 RecombinaseSingle-Cell AnalysisXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRad51 Recombinase53BP1BRCA1cancer biologycell biologycell cycleDNA repairhumanmitosisPARP1

Identifiers

PMID33983115
PMCPMC8169122
OpenAlexW3160730110

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.