Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991093›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2021

Challenges for FAIR-compliant description and comparison of crop phenotype data with standardized controlled vocabularies.

Liliana Andrés-Hernández, Razlin Azman Halimi, Ramil Mauleon, Sean Mayes, Abdul Baten, Graham J King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liliana Andrés-HernándezSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Razlin Azman HalimiSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Ramil MauleonSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Sean MayesSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD,Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abdul BatenInstitute of Precision Medicine & Bioinformatics, Sydney Local Health District, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Graham J KingSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-6051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop phenotypic data underpin many pre-breeding efforts to characterize variation within germplasm collections. Although there has been an increase in the global capacity for accumulating and comparing such data, a lack of consistency in the systematic description of metadata often limits integration and sharing. We therefore aimed to understand some of the challenges facing findable, accesible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) curation and annotation of phenotypic data from minor and underutilized crops. We used bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) as an exemplar underutilized crop to assess the ability of the Crop Ontology system to facilitate curation of trait datasets, so that they are accessible for comparative analysis. This involved generating a controlled vocabulary Trait Dictionary of 134 terms. Systematic quantification of syntactic and semantic cohesiveness of the full set of 28 crop-specific COs identified inconsistencies between trait descriptor names, a relative lack of cross-referencing to other ontologies and a flat ontological structure for classifying traits. We also evaluated the Minimal Information About a Phenotyping Experiment and FAIR compliance of bambara trait datasets curated within the CropStoreDB schema. We discuss specifications for a more systematic and generic approach to trait controlled vocabularies, which would benefit from representation of terms that adhere to Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies principles. In particular, we focus on the benefits of reuse of existing definitions within pre- and post-composed axioms from other domains in order to facilitate the curation and comparison of datasets from a wider range of crops. Database URL: https://www.cropstoredb.org/cs_bambara.html.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesPlant BreedingMetadataPhenotypeVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID33991093
PMCPMC8122365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.