Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33992157›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2021

Innate immunity in C. elegans.

Céline N Martineau, Natalia V Kirienko, Nathalie Pujol

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
35.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Proximity Labeling inBio-protocol · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. MLT-11 is necessary forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Céline N MartineauAix Marseille Université, Inserm, CNRS, CIML, Turing Centre for Living Systems, Marseille, France.
Natalia V KirienkoDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: kirienko@rice.edu.
Nathalie PujolAix Marseille Université, Inserm, CNRS, CIML, Turing Centre for Living Systems, Marseille, France. Electronic address: pujol@ciml.univ-mrs.fr.
Centre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy · FRRice University · US

Funding

Regulation of mitochondrial surveillanceR35GM129294 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Natasha Kirienko · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM129294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In its natural habitat, C. elegans encounters a wide variety of microbes, including food, commensals and pathogens. To be able to survive long enough to reproduce, C. elegans has developed a complex array of responses to pathogens. These activities are coordinated on scales that range from individual organelles to the entire organism. Often, the response is triggered within cells, by detection of infection-induced damage, mainly in the intestine or epidermis. C. elegans has, however, a capacity for cell non-autonomous regulation of these responses. This frequently involves the nervous system, integrating pathogen recognition, altering host biology and governing avoidance behavior. Although there are significant differences with the immune system of mammals, some mechanisms used to limit pathogenesis show remarkable phylogenetic conservation. The past 20 years have witnessed an explosion of host-pathogen interaction studies using C. elegans as a model. This review will discuss the broad themes that have emerged and highlight areas that remain to be fully explored.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansImmunity, InnateAnimalsPhylogenyAntimicrobial peptideBehaviorDamage responsesHost defenceIntercellular signalingModel organismNatural pathogenOxidative stressProteostasisStress responses

Identifiers

PMID33992157
PMCPMC9175240
OpenAlexW3163767088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.