Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33993297›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Comparative phylogenetics of repetitive elements in a diverse order of flowering plants (Brassicales).

Aleksandra Beric, Makenzie E Mabry, Alex E Harkess, Julia Brose, M Eric Schranz, Gavin C Conant, Patrick P Edger, Blake C Meyers, J Chris Pires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New Insights Into the Evolution of CFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aleksandra BericDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.
Makenzie E MabryDivision of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Alex E HarkessDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Julia BroseDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Gavin C ConantBioinformatics Research Center, Program in Genetics and Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Patrick P EdgerDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Blake C MeyersDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome sizes of plants have long piqued the interest of researchers due to the vast differences among organisms. However, the mechanisms that drive size differences have yet to be fully understood. Two important contributing factors to genome size are expansions of repetitive elements, such as transposable elements (TEs), and whole-genome duplications (WGD). Although studies have found correlations between genome size and both TE abundance and polyploidy, these studies typically test for these patterns within a genus or species. The plant order Brassicales provides an excellent system to further test if genome size evolution patterns are consistent across larger time scales, as there are numerous WGDs. This order is also home to one of the smallest plant genomes, Arabidopsis thaliana-chosen as the model plant system for this reason-as well as to species with very large genomes. With new methods that allow for TE characterization from low-coverage genome shotgun data and 71 taxa across the Brassicales, we confirm the correlation between genome size and TE content, however, we are unable to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and do not detect any shift in TE abundance associated with WGD.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenome SizePhylogenyPlantsPolyploidyDNA Transposable ElementsBrassicalesevolutiongenome sizerepetitive elementswhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID33993297
PMCPMC8495927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.