Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33998038›Full record

ReviewGenetic epidemiology2021

Penalized linear mixed models for structured genetic data.

Anna C Reisetter, Patrick Breheny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genetic epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Familial Oculoauriculovertebral Spectrum: A Genomic Investigation of Autosomal Dominant Inheritance.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna C ReisetterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-4585
Patrick BrehenyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0650-1119

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genetic studies that aim to identify genetic variants associated with complex phenotypes are subject to unobserved confounding factors arising from environmental heterogeneity. This poses a challenge to detecting associations of interest and is known to induce spurious associations when left unaccounted for. Penalized linear mixed models (LMMs) are an attractive method to correct for unobserved confounding. These methods correct for varying levels of relatedness and population structure by modeling it as a random effect with a covariance structure estimated from observed genetic data. Despite an extensive literature on penalized regression and LMMs separately, the two are rarely discussed together. The aim of this review is to do so while examining the statistical properties of penalized LMMs in the genetic association setting. Specifically, the ability of penalized LMMs to accurately estimate genetic effects in the presence of environmental confounding has not been well studied. To clarify the important yet subtle distinction between population structure and environmental heterogeneity, we present a detailed review of relevant concepts and methods. In addition, we evaluate the performance of penalized LMMs and competing methods in terms of estimation and selection accuracy in the presence of a number of confounding structures.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideHumansLinear ModelsPhenotypeconfoundinglassolinear mixed modelpenalized regressionpopulation stratification

Identifiers

PMID33998038
PMCPMC13232657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.