ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Relative Retinal Blood Flow: A Novel and Informative Measure of Unilateral Retinal Vein Occlusion Severity.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elevated retinal artery vascular resistance determined by novel visualized technique of laser speckle flowgraphy in branch retinal vein occlusion.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- The Impact of Carotid Endarterectomy on Choriocapillaris Perfusion.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Observational
- Reliability of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Retinal Blood Flow Analyses.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-03-02Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study quantifies retinal vascular blood flow affected by unilateral central or branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO or BRVO). We created a new, unitless metric for the severity of these diseases-relative blood flow (RBF)-and contextualized it with subject demographics, ocular presentation, and systemic conditions. Finally, we explored its efficacy as a predictor of future outcomes. Methods: Data were collected from 20 control subjects and 32 clinically diagnosed CRVO (n = 15) or BRVO (n = 17) patients. We used laser speckle flowgraphy to quantify blood flow as mean blur rate and present RBF as the ratio between the blood flow in a subject's diseased and undiseased eyes. Because of our demonstration that blood flow has high intrapatient (between eyes and over time) but low interpatient correlation in eyes of healthy subjects, any differences between eyes can be attributed to the disease. These data were correlated with subject demographics and disease characteristics. Results: In CRVO and BRVO eyes, average blood flow decreased by 26% and 7%, respectively. In CRVO, occlusion duration, central macular thickness, intraocular pressure, diabetes, previous laser and injection treatments, and injection within three months after measurement were significantly associated with RBF. In BRVO, no significant associations with RBF were found. Conclusions: Blood flow in CRVO and BRVO was reduced compared to the unaffected fellow eye in most patients. RBF was useful in determining the severity of RVOs and predicting future treatment needs. Translational Relevance: RBF is a promising new and informative metric for quantifying the severity of unilateral RVOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.