Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34004154›Full record

Trial reportChest2021

Outpatient Management of Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter Prospective Validation of the Hospitalization or Outpatient Management of Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Rule to Discharge Patients Safely.

Delphine Douillet, Andrea Penaloza, Rafaël Mahieu, François Morin, Anthony Chauvin, Stéphane Gennai, Thibault Schotte, Emmanuel Montassier, Pierre-Clément Thiebaud, Alexandre Ghuysen François and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04338841 (HOME-CoV), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04338841 nacompletednot on this map

HOME-CoV: Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With Confirmed or Probable SARS-CoV-2 Infection. A Before and After Implementation of a Consensus Help-decision Making Rule Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2020 to 2020Enrolled3,133ConditionsCoronavirus InfectionArmsHOME-CoV rule implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Risk model derivation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from the emergency department.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Delphine DouilletDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France; UMR MitoVasc CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, Health Faculty, Université Angers, Angers, France; FCRIN, INNOVTE, Angers, France. Electronic address: delphinedouillet@gmail.com.
Andrea PenalozaDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Rafaël MahieuDepartment of Infectious Disease, Université Angers, Angers, France; CRCINA, Inserm, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
François MorinDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Anthony ChauvinDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Stéphane GennaiDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Thibault SchotteDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Le Mans Hospital, Le Mans, France.
Emmanuel MontassierDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Pierre-Clément ThiebaudDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Alexandre Ghuysen FrançoisEmergency Department, Sart Tilman University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
David Dall'acquaDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Vichy Hospital, Vichy, France.
Kasarra BenhammoudaDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Colmar Hospital, Colmar, France.
Pascal BissokeleDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Libourne Hospital, Libourne, France.
Mathieu VioleauDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Niort Hospital, Niort, France.
Luc-Marie JolyDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Hery AndrianjafyDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Longjumeau Hospital, Longjumeau, France.
Caroline SoulieEmergency Department, Cholet Hospital, Cholet, France.
Dominique SavaryDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France; Department of Infectious Disease, Université Angers, Angers, France; UMR MitoVasc CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, Health Faculty, Université Angers, Angers, France; FCRIN, INNOVTE, Angers, France; CRCINA, Inserm, University of Nantes, Nantes, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Le Mans Hospital, Le Mans, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Vichy Hospital, Vichy, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Colmar Hospital, Colmar, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Niort Hospital, Niort, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Longjumeau Hospital, Longjumeau, France; Emergency Department, Cholet Hospital, Cholet, France; EHESP, Irset, Inserm, UMR S1085, CAPTV CDC, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; Département de Médecine d'Urgence, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium; Emergency Department, Sart Tilman University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Jérémie RiouMethodology and Biostatistics Department, Delegation to Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France; Micro et Nano médecines Translationnelles, MINT, Université Angers, UMR INSERM 1066, UMR CNRS 6021, Angers, France.
Pierre-Marie RoyDépartement de Médecine d'Urgence, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France; UMR MitoVasc CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, Health Faculty, Université Angers, Angers, France; FCRIN, INNOVTE, Angers, France.
Hospitalization or Outpatient Management of Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Study Group
Centre Hospitalier de Lens · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier de Niort · FRCentre Hospitalier du Mans · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Fernand-Widal · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHopitaux Civils de Colmar · FRInstitut Européen De La Qualité Totale · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversity of Liège · BEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRInstitut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hospitalization or Outpatient Management of Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection (HOME-CoV) rule is a checklist of eligibility criteria for home treatment of patients with COVID-19, defined using a Delphi method. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the HOME-CoV rule reliable for identifying a subgroup of COVID-19 patients with a low risk of adverse outcomes who can be treated at home safely? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe aimed to validate the HOME-CoV rule in a prospective, multicenter study before and after trial of patients with probable or confirmed COVID-19 who sought treatment at the ED of 34 hospitals. The main outcome was an adverse evolution, that is, invasive ventilation or death, occurring within the 7 days after patient admission. The performance of the rule was assessed by the false-negative rate. The impact of the rule implementation was assessed by the absolute differences in the rate of patients who required invasive ventilation or who died and in the rate of patients treated at home, between an observational and an interventional period after implementation of the HOME-CoV rule, with propensity score adjustment.

resultsAmong 3,000 prospectively enrolled patients, 1,239 (41.3%) demonstrated a negative HOME-CoV rule finding. The false-negative rate of the HOME-CoV rule was 4 in 1,239 (0.32%; 95% CI, 0.13%-0.84%), and its area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 80.9 (95% CI, 76.5-85.2). On the adjusted populations, 25 of 1,274 patients (1.95%) experienced an adverse evolution during the observational period vs 12 of 1,274 patients (0.95%) during the interventional period: -1.00 (95% CI, -1.86 to -0.15). During the observational period, 858 patients (67.35%) were treated at home vs 871 patients (68.37%) during the interventional period: -1.02 (95% CI, -4.46 to 2.26).

interpretationA large proportion of patients treated in the ED with probable or confirmed COVID-19 have a negative HOME-CoV rule finding and can be treated safely at home with a very low risk of complications. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04338841; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDisease ManagementOutpatientsSARS-CoV-2Ambulatory CareCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Dischargeclinical support decision toolCOVID-19expert consensushospitalizationoutpatientrule-based decision-makingrule validation

Identifiers

PMID34004154
PMCPMC8123410
OpenAlexW3160576313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.