ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
PDZ Sample Quality Assessment by Biochemical and Biophysical Characterizations.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PDZ domains are small globular domains involved in protein-protein interactions. They participate in a wide range of critical cellular processes. These domains, very abundant in the human proteome, are widely studied by high-throughput interactomics approaches and by biophysical and structural methods. However, the quality of the results is strongly related to the optimal folding and solubility of the domains. We provide here a detailed description of protocols for a strict quality assessment of the PDZ constructs. We describe appropriate experimental approaches that have been selected to overcome the small size of such domains to check the purity, identity, homogeneity, stability, and folding of samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34014518What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.