Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022839›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Evaluating OzHarvest's primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.

F Karpouzis, R Lindberg, A Walsh, S Shah, G Abbott, J Lai, A Berner, K Ball

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05278377 (Effectiveness of the Apprenti en Action School-based Culinary Program on 9-10-year-old Children's Food Literacy and Vegetable and Fruit Consumption), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05278377 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of the Apprenti en Action School-based Culinary Program on 9-10-year-old Children's Food Literacy and Vegetable and Fruit Consumption

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversite de MonctonRan2022 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsFruit and Vegetable Intake, Eating BehaviorArms"Apprenti en Action" program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Beyond Breakfast: Exploring What Works for Schools Delivering School Breakfast Programs in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact and evaluation of an online culinary nutrition course for health, education and industry professionals to promote vegetable knowledge and consumption.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Nutrition and Food Literacy in the MENA Region: A Review to Inform Nutrition Research and Policy Makers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F KarpouzisFaculty of Health, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. fkarpouzis@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-0440
R LindbergFaculty of Health, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
A WalshSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
S ShahFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
G AbbottFaculty of Health, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J LaieResearch, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
A BernerOzHarvest, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
K BallFaculty of Health, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1191162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe promotion of healthy eating is a public health priority. Poor dietary behaviours, including low fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption are of particular concern among children. Novel nutrition promotion strategies are needed to improve F&V consumption. Sustainability education could be used to support nutrition education within the school context. The purpose of this paper is to report the protocol for impact and process evaluation of the school-based Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program, designed to educate children about sustainability, food waste and nutrition, using hands-on cooking activities.

methodsA pragmatic, parallel, cluster non-randomized controlled trial with pre- and post-measures, will be implemented among 20 primary schools (10 intervention vs 10 wait-list-control) within NSW, Australia, involving children in Grades 5-6. FEAST is a curriculum-aligned program, delivered as a 1.5-h lesson/week, for a 10-week unit of inquiry, incorporating theory and cooking. FEAST was developed using theoretical frameworks which included Social Cognitive Theory and the Precede-Proceed Planning model. Primary outcomes include children's self-reported F&V intakes (serves/day). Food literacy constructs such as: nutrition knowledge, food preparation and cooking skills, self-efficacy and behaviours, food waste knowledge and behaviours and food production knowledge, will be assessed as secondary outcomes. Process evaluation will assess program reach, adoption, implementation, maintenance, satisfaction and perceived benefits by teachers and students. An online survey (including quantitative and qualitative questions) was developed for administration at baseline (impact evaluation) and immediately post-intervention (impact and process evaluation). Intervention effects on quantitative study outcomes will be estimated with ​generalised linear mixed models, including random effects and will follow the intention-to-treat principles. Open-ended questions embedded within the surveys will be analysed qualitatively using content and thematic analyses. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial will provide valuable information on the value of adding environmental sustainability strategies to nutrition education in schools. Results will inform the design of future research and programs focused on primary-school children's nutrition, sustainability-related behaviours and experiential school-based interventions.

trial registrationTrial registered 14th December 2020 with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620001347954 ).

Indexed as

Refuse DisposalSchool Health ServicesAustraliaChildHealth PromotionHumansNew ZealandNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProgram EvaluationSchoolsChildrenCluster non-randomized controlled trialCookingFood wasteFruitNutritionPrimary schoolProcess evaluationSustainabilityVegetable

Identifiers

PMID34022839
PMCPMC8140478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.