Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025096›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2021

Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings.

Mohamed A Omer, Jose E Exaire, Jacob C Jentzer, Yader B Sandoval, Mandeep Singh, Charles R Cagin, Islam Y Elgendy, Tahir Tak

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed A OmerCardiovascular Services, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Jose E ExaireCardiovascular Services, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Jacob C JentzerMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yader B SandovalMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mandeep SinghMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Charles R CaginCardiovascular Services, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Islam Y ElgendyDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Tahir TakCardiovascular Services, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic Health System · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention and modern antithrombotic therapy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the leading cause of death in the United States and remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Certain high-risk patients present a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. The widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention in addition to modern antithrombotic therapy has resulted in substantial improvement in the short- and long-term prognosis following STEMI. In this review, we aim to provide a brief analysis of the state-of-the-art treatment for patients presenting with STEMI, focusing on cardiogenic shock, current treatment and controversies, cardiac arrest, and diagnosis and treatment of mechanical complications, as well as multivessel and left main-related STEMI.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestcardiogenic shockmultivesselmyocardial infarctionSTEMI

Identifiers

PMID34025096
PMCPMC8128492
OpenAlexW3131287818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.