Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025981›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2021

Identification of clinical phenotypes in schizophrenia: the role of lurasidone.

Marco Andrea Riva, Umberto Albert, Sergio de Filippis, Antonio Vita, Domenico De Berardis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of lumateperone in the treatment of schizophrenia.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco Andrea RivaDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.
Umberto AlbertDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy.
Sergio de FilippisVilla Von Siebenthal Neuropsychiatric Clinic, Genzano, Roma, Italy.
Antonio VitaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Domenico De BerardisNHS, Department of Mental Health, Hospital "G. Mazzini", ASL 4, Teramo, 64100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-5058
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITNini Hospital · LBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITVilla Melitta · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of schizophrenia includes the control of symptoms, the prevention of relapses, and amelioration of adaptive skills for patient re-integration into society. Antipsychotic drugs are the agents of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia, as they reduce the positive symptoms of psychosis. Lurasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic drug representing a novel and useful clinical tool for the management of schizophrenia. A board consisting of a panel of Italian expert psychiatrists was organized with the following aims: (a) defining the current modalities of use of lurasidone, highlighted through 17 specific questions; (b) defining and agreeing the main features of the drug and the principal reasons to suggest its administration. We established that lurasidone is suggested at any age, with no gender difference, at all stages of the disease. The switch from previous treatments is done primarily because of lack of efficacy as well as poor adherence/tolerability. Lurasidone is among the best-tolerated antipsychotics, and its use is indicated in the presence of different comorbidities. A wide range of dosages is available, allowing safe titration in particular cases, with the highest dose (148 mg) generally used for the treatment of the acute phase. The discontinuation rate due to poor tolerability, low compliance, and interactions with other drugs is very low. Akathisia is the most reported adverse event, but it may be controlled by dose reduction. Lurasidone does not possess a marked sedative action but, in agitated patients, can be associated with sedative drugs, such as benzodiazepines. The most frequent reason for switching to other therapies is the need for long-acting formulations, as in patients at risk of very low adherence or suicide. Lurasidone does not strongly impact metabolism or the cardiovascular system (QT interval), and does not influence the metabolism of other drugs, showing good efficacy and tolerability.

Indexed as

adherenceantipsychotic agentslurasidonephenotypesschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID34025981
PMCPMC8120523
OpenAlexW3161210054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.