Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026569›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2021

Predictors of acceptability and engagement in a self-guided online program for depression and anxiety.

Amelia Gulliver, Alison L Calear, Matthew Sunderland, Frances Kay-Lambkin, Louise M Farrer, Philip J Batterham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Does adding coaching calls into an online lifestyle intervention for cancer survivors make it more acceptable and feasible than a self-guided version?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amelia GulliverCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Matthew SunderlandThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Level 6, Jane Foss Russell Building, G02, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia.
Frances Kay-LambkinPriority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, McAuley Centre, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Louise M FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 63 Eggleston Rd, Acton, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow engagement with self-guided online programs limits the potential of these programs to provide effective and low-cost treatment of mild to moderate depression and anxiety at scale. Identifying factors that increase uptake and adherence in self-guided online programs may facilitate the development of targeted implementation strategies to increase engagement with these programs in the community. Using data from a randomized controlled trial of a self-guided online program for depression and anxiety, the aim of this study was to identify predictors of the acceptability of internet-based psychological programs, and engagement (uptake and adherence) with the online program tested in the trial.

methodsA total of 556 community members with elevated symptoms of depression or anxiety were recruited via social media into the two active conditions of a three-arm randomized controlled trial. This trial tested the effectiveness of a 7-week self-guided online program for depression and anxiety called

resultsLogistic regression demonstrated that higher levels of conscientiousness ( DISCUSSION: Acceptability of internet-based psychological programs was identified as a factor that increased both uptake and adherence to the

Indexed as

AdherenceAFI, Acceptance-Facilitation InterventionEFI, Engagement Facilitation InterventionEngagement-facilitation interventionInternet.Mental healthUptake

Identifiers

PMID34026569
PMCPMC8122006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.