Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028126›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2021

Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial.

Sara A Hurvitz, Cristina Saura, Mafalda Oliveira, Maureen E Trudeau, Beverly Moy, Suzette Delaloge, William Gradishar, Sung-Bae Kim, Barbara Haley, Larisa Ryvo and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Concurrent systemic treatment during stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastasis - analysis of survival outcomes and propensity score matching analysis.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 18 institutions in 8 countries.

Sara A HurvitzUniversity of California Los Angeles/Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-7191
Cristina SauraVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, SOLTI Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Mafalda OliveiraVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, SOLTI Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Maureen E TrudeauSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beverly MoyMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Suzette DelalogeGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
William GradisharRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sung-Bae KimAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Barbara HaleyUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Larisa RyvoSourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ming-Shen DaiTri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Vladimir MilovanovTambov Regional Oncology Center, Tambov, Russia.
Jesús AlarcónHospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Sujith KalmadiIronwood Cancer and Research Centers, Chandler, Arizona, USA.
Eduardo CronembergerCentro Regional Integrado de Oncologia, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Cristiano SouzaHospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana LandeiroNucleo de Oncologia Da Bahia, Ondina, Bahia, Brazil.
Ron BoseWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Judith BebchukPuma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA.
Fairooz KabbinavarPuma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA.
Richard BrycePuma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kiana KeyvanjahPuma Biotechnology, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA.
Adam M BrufskyMagee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Puma Biotechnology (United States) · USVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESCentro de Pesquisas Oncológicas · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRIronwood Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USMagee-Womens Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USSecretaria da Educação do Estado da Bahia · BRSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CATel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USTri-Service General Hospital · TWUlsan College · KRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C). MATERIALS AND

methodsNALA was a randomized, active-controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2-directed regimens for HER2-positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m

resultsOf 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS-directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59-1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed.

conclusionThese analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2-positive MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2-directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression-free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2-positive brain metastases following antibody-based HER2-directed therapies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCentral Nervous SystemFemaleHumansQuinolinesTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesneratinibQuinolinesCapecitabineCentral nervous system neoplasmsLapatinibNeratinibReceptor, ErbB-2

Identifiers

PMID34028126
PMCPMC8342591
OpenAlexW3165169142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.