Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028357›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Improving Current Glycated Hemoglobin Prediction in Adults: Use of Machine Learning Algorithms With Electronic Health Records.

Zakhriya Alhassan, Matthew Watson, David Budgen, Riyad Alshammari, Ali Alessa, Noura Al Moubayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zakhriya AlhassanDepartment of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-1656
Matthew WatsonDepartment of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-3905
David BudgenDepartment of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-0241
Riyad AlshammariNational Center for Artificial Intelligence, Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0529-2458
Ali AlessaDepartment of Information Technology Programs, Institute of Public Administration, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-7445
Noura Al MoubayedDepartment of Computer Science, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8942-355X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the risk of glycated hemoglobin (HbA

objectiveOur study investigated the performance of predictive models to forecast HbA

methodsThis study employed multiple logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression models, as well as a deep learning model (multilayer perceptron) to classify patients with normal (<5.7%) and elevated (≥5.7%) levels of HbA

resultsThe machine learning models achieved promising results for predicting current HbA

conclusionsThis study shows that machine learning models can provide promising results for the task of predicting current HbA

Indexed as

deep learningdiabeteselectronic health recordsglycated hemoglobin HbA1clongitudinal datamachine learningmultilayer perceptronneural networkpredictiontime series data

Identifiers

PMID34028357
PMCPMC8185616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.