Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34037531›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2021

Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study.

Aleeha Iftikhar, Raymond R Bond, Victoria McGilligan, Stephen J Leslie, Khaled Rjoob, Charles Knoery, Ciara Quigg, Ryan Campbell, Kyle Boyd, Anne McShane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleeha IftikharComputing Engineering and Build Environment, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9764-3605
Raymond R BondComputing Engineering and Build Environment, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-2232
Victoria McGilliganCentre for Personalised Medicine, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-3504
Stephen J LeslieCardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1403-4733
Khaled RjoobComputing Engineering and Build Environment, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-2323
Charles KnoeryCardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-2791
Ciara QuiggDepartment of Cardiology, Altnagelvin Hospital, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5916-1250
Ryan CampbellDepartment of Cardiology, Altnagelvin Hospital, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-6404
Kyle BoydFaculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-4833
Anne McShaneLetterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-4882
Aaron PeaceDepartment of Cardiology, Altnagelvin Hospital, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9556-7509
University of Ulster · GBWestern Health and Social Care Trust · GBRaigmore Hospital · GBLetterkenny University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven in the era of digital technology, several hospitals still rely on paper-based forms for data entry for patient admission, triage, drug prescriptions, and procedures. Paper-based forms can be quick and convenient to complete but often at the expense of data quality, completeness, sustainability, and automated data analytics. Digital forms can improve data quality by assisting the user when deciding on the appropriate response to certain data inputs (eg, classifying symptoms). Greater data quality via digital form completion not only helps with auditing, service improvement, and patient record keeping but also helps with novel data science and machine learning research. Although digital forms are becoming more prevalent in health care, there is a lack of empirical best practices and guidelines for their design. The study-based hospital had a definite plan to abolish the paper form; hence, it was not necessary to compare the digital forms with the paper form.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the usability of three different interactive forms: a single-page digital form (in which all data input is required on one web page), a multipage digital form, and a conversational digital form (a chatbot).

methodsThe three digital forms were developed as candidates to replace the current paper-based form used to record patient referrals to an interventional cardiology department (Cath-Lab) at Altnagelvin Hospital. We recorded usability data in a counterbalanced usability test (60 usability tests: 20 subjects×3 form usability tests). The usability data included task completion times, System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, User Experience Questionnaire data, and data from a postexperiment questionnaire.

resultsWe found that the single-page form outperformed the other two digital forms in almost all usability metrics. The mean SUS score for the single-page form was 76 (SD 15.8; P=.01) when compared with the multipage form, which had a mean score of 67 (SD 17), and the conversational form attained the lowest scores in usability testing and was the least preferred choice of users, with a mean score of 57 (SD 24). An SUS score of >68 was considered above average. The single-page form achieved the least task completion time compared with the other two digital form styles.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the digital single-page form outperformed the other two forms in almost all usability metrics; it had the least task completion time compared with those of the other two digital forms. Moreover, on answering the open-ended question from the final customized postexperiment questionnaire, the single-page form was the preferred choice.

Indexed as

conversational formsdigital formshealth caremultipage formsingle-page formusability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34037531
PMCPMC8190652
OpenAlexW3150251161

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.